<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2013 Layer 3 Technologies &#38; Hazlow Electronics Rochester ProAm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com</link>
	<description>PSA Challenger 5+ Tournament April 9th-14th 2013</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lucas defeats Galvez for 2013 Rochester ProAm title</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/14/lucas-defeats-galvez-for-2013-rochester-proam-title/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/14/lucas-defeats-galvez-for-2013-rochester-proam-title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Match report by Hameed Ahmed) Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Eric Galvez (MEX) 10-12,11-2, 8-11, 11-8,11-6 (102m) After a thrilling night of semifinals, the stage was set for Rochester to witness a final battle between two first timers in Rochester, young<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/14/lucas-defeats-galvez-for-2013-rochester-proam-title/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(Match report by Hameed Ahmed)</em></p>
<p><strong>Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Eric Galvez (MEX) 10-12,11-2, 8-11, 11-8,11-6 (102m)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/images/2013/photo-18.JPG" border=0><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/images/2013/photo-18.JPG" height="300" width="400" padding="10" align=left></a> After a thrilling night of semifinals, the stage was set for Rochester to witness a final battle between two first timers in Rochester, young Lucas Serme from France taking on the experienced Eric Galvez from Mexico.</p>
<p>Galvez started off very well taking the control of the game from the beginning. He was already 9-4 and 10-6 up but Serme was able to eventually take the game into a tiebreaker. The Mexican started attacking again in the last rallies and was able to win the first one 12-10.</p>
<p>Serme came into the second one with a lot more energy and quickly got a 3-0 lead. Galvez was still not attacking and serme kept picking everything up. Easy mistakes from a tired galvez and great attacking squash from the Frenchman &#8211; game to serme 11-2.</p>
<p>Galvez kept on putting pressure to back court and got a quick 6-1 lead. Serme started to use front court more and move Galvez around the court. The Mexican started to look tired and made some easy mistakes. Serme was already a point away at 6-7 but galvez hit a great drop to get to 8-6. Galvez won the game 11-8 in the end.</p>
<p>Serme got ahead in the fourth and kept the lead until Galvez found another gear and got back to 8-8. Serme was able to clinch it in the end though and took it into a fifth.</p>
<p>Serme looked to be the stronger one in the fifth and Galvez made a lot of mistakes especially in the beginning. Serme got up to 6-2 but Galvez quickly got back to 5-6. After that, 3 easy mistakes again from galvez to give Serme a 9-5 lead. The Frenchman eventually closed it 11-6 and was crowned the Rochester ProAm champion of 2013.</p>
<p>Both players displayed great skill, athleticism and sportsmanship throughout the match and were a treat to watch for the Rochester crowd! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/14/lucas-defeats-galvez-for-2013-rochester-proam-title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semifinals</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/13/semifinals-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/13/semifinals-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Galvez (MEX) bt Alfredo Avila (MEX) 11-7, 11-3, 11-5 (58m) Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Andres Duany (PER) 7-11, 11-7, 11-6, 11-6 (60m)]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Galvez (MEX) bt Alfredo Avila (MEX) 11-7, 11-3, 11-5 (58m)<br />
Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Andres Duany (PER) 7-11, 11-7, 11-6, 11-6 (60m)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/13/semifinals-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quarterfinals complete</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/12/quarterfinals-complete-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/12/quarterfinals-complete-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 04:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alfredo Avila (MEX) bt. Declan James (ENG) 1-11, 11-0, 11-9, 7-11, 11-8 (70m) Eric Galvez (MEX) bt Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) 11-3, 11-1, 11-8 (47m) Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Chris Binnie (JAM) 11-6, 11-3, 11-3 (30m) Andres Duany (PER) bt. David<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/12/quarterfinals-complete-3/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alfredo Avila (MEX) bt. Declan James (ENG) 1-11, 11-0, 11-9, 7-11, 11-8 (70m)<br />
Eric Galvez (MEX) bt Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) 11-3, 11-1, 11-8 (47m)<br />
Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Chris Binnie (JAM) 11-6, 11-3, 11-3 (30m) </p>
<p><strong>Andres Duany (PER) bt. David Letourneau (CAN) 11-7, 11-5, 8-11, 11-6 (58m)<br />
</strong><br />
It was obvious from the start that the pressure was on David Letourneau, who has been playing professionally for 2 years since graduating from Princeton. Perhaps that&#8217;s why the Canadian looked very nervous right from the start. Meanwhile, University of Rochester&#8217;s senior Duany walked on court confidently and with nothing to lose.</p>
<p>Duany quickly got up to 6-0, mostly by solid pressure and good length. Letourneau got back into the game after this but Duany&#8217;s lead was too much. Duany&#8217;s corner game worked in the second too and Letourneau couldn&#8217;t find a way to turn the momentum.</p>
<p>With Duany being up 2-0 in games, Letourneau slowed down the pace significantly in the third, forcing Duany to take initiative. It was a very close game until 8-8 at which point Duany made 3 unforced errors to give the game to Letourneau.</p>
<p>The Canadian came in to the fourth game with some new energy but Duany was ready for it. The Peruvian continued to use the front of the court more and more and Letourneau started to look tired and frustrated. The game was close Duany made some quick points at the end and Letourneau was forced to hit the tin a few times. The fourth game to Duany 11-6 and a very unexpected semi-final spot for the wildcard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/12/quarterfinals-complete-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First round of the main draw complete</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/11/first-round-of-the-main-draw-complete/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/11/first-round-of-the-main-draw-complete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some amazing matches tonight, many lasting the full 5 games including a marathon between England&#8217;s Declan James and Pakistan&#8217;s Hamza Bukhari that lasted two hours and 20 minutes with James ultimately prevailing over his opponent! Photos to follow &#8211; Alfredo<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/11/first-round-of-the-main-draw-complete/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some amazing matches tonight, many lasting the full 5 games including a marathon between England&#8217;s Declan James and Pakistan&#8217;s Hamza Bukhari that lasted two hours and 20 minutes with James ultimately prevailing over his opponent! Photos to follow &#8211;  </p>
<p>Alfredo Avila (MEX) bt. Mike McCue (CAN) 11-4, 11-6, 11-5 (46m)<br />
Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) bt. Aqib Hanif (PAK) 11-9, 12-10, 11-8 (53m)<br />
Eric Galvez (MEX) bt Scott Arnold (AUS) 11-4, 11-5, 8-11, 11-3 (55m)<br />
Chris Binnie (JAM) bt Thomas Brinkman (CAN) 13-11, 11-5, 6-11, 7-11, 11-6 (62m)<br />
Lucas Serme (FRA) bt Lewis Walters (ENG) 11-6, 11-6, 3-11, 2-11, 11-6 (75m)<br />
Andres Duany (PER) bt. Olivier Pett (ENG) 11-5, 11-3, retd.<br />
(Olivier had to withdraw midway through the match due to a persisting illness)</p>
<p><strong>Declan James (ENG) bt. Hamza Bukhari (PAK) 7-11, 14-12, 11-5, 7-11, 11-8 (140m)<br />
</strong><br />
The longest match of tournament was a battle between two players that didn&#8217;t like to do much with the ball. Instead, they relied on solid length, patience and their physicality. And fitness was definitely something they needed: The match lasted for almost 2.5 hours. It might have been a different story if Bukhari could have taken the second game after being 1-0 up. The Pakistani had several game balls but James hung in there and was eventually able to equalize the game score to 1-1. At that point, the match had already been going on for over an hour. After winning the third quite easily, James looked to be the strong favorite to take the match. Furthermore, Bukhari was struggling between games with blisters. While everyone thought the match was over, it was a totally different Bukhari who came on court in the fourth. The Pakistani won the game and was looking very strong at the beginning of the fifth as well. James eventually got a lead at the end and Bukhari &#8211; who had cramps bothering him at this point &#8211; couldn&#8217;t catch up. It will be interesting to see how James recovers for the quarter-final match.</p>
<p><strong>Dave Letourneau (CAN) bt. Hernan D?Arcangelo (ARG) 11-2, 12-10, 8-11, 13-11 (53m)<br />
</strong><br />
Letourneau cruised through the first game and looked to be very solid and impossible for D&#8217;Arcangelo to beat. The Argentinian stepped up in the second though and took the game into a tie-breaker. Letourneau was able to squeeze it at the end and got a comfortable 2-0 lead. At 8-8 in the third, D&#8217;Arcangelo found another gear though and Letourneau made some easy mistakes and started to look a bit nervous. The Argentinian won the third and it seemed to be anyone&#8217;s match at this point. The fourth game was very close until 8-8 but Letourneau started to hit the ball a lot harder and it seemed tough for D&#8217;Arcangelo to adapt to the speed. The Argentinian was able to take the game to a tie-breaker but Letourneau&#8217;s change of tactics paid off in the end and he proceeded to the quarter finals. Letourneau, a Princeton alum, will now face University of Rochester&#8217;s senior Andres Duany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/11/first-round-of-the-main-draw-complete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualifying finals</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/10/qualifying-finals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/10/qualifying-finals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike McCue (CAN) bt Micah Franklin (BER) 11-5, 11-3, 11-5 (30m) Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) bt Matt Serediak (CAN) 3-11, 11-5, 11-6, 11-8 (55m) The first few rallies were long and close but after Serediak got a 4-2 lead, he cruised<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/10/qualifying-finals/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mike McCue (CAN) bt Micah Franklin (BER) 11-5, 11-3, 11-5 (30m)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) bt Matt Serediak (CAN) 3-11, 11-5, 11-6, 11-8 (55m)<br />
</strong><br />
The first few rallies were long and close but after Serediak got a 4-2 lead, he cruised for the rest of the game. Mehmund got frustrated towards the end and started to make mistakes. Serediak quickly closed it 11-3.<br />
Mehmund started playing much more patiently in the second and lifting the ball higher. This resulted in a lot of long rallies and Serediak started to look slightly tired. Solid squash from Mehmund coupled with unforced errors from Serediak &#8211; game to Mehmund 11-5.<br />
The third was close up to 5-5 after which Mehmund started to play more physically especially in the middle of the court. The Pakistani won the third quite comfortably 11-6.<br />
The physical game worked for Mehmund also in the fourth in which he got a 8-2 lead fairly quickly. Serediak got back to 8-6 but the Pakistani was able to eventually win the game with a crosscourt nick 11-8 and take the match in four.</p>
<p><strong>Chris Binnie bt Adam Perkiomaki  11-8, 10-12, 11-8, 11-4 (46m)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Syed Hamza Shah Bukhari(PAK) bt Reuben Philips(ENG) 11-6, 11-3, 6-11, 11-7 (70m)<br />
</strong><br />
Qualifier 1 Michael Mc Cue (plays Avila)<br />
Qualifier 2 Syed Hamza Shah Bukhari (plays James)<br />
Qualifier 3 Aurangzeb Mehmund (plays Hanif)<br />
Qualifier 4 Chris Binnie (plays Brinkman)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/10/qualifying-finals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualifying Round 1 complete</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photos by Paul Schwartz: Matt Serediak (CAN) bt. Le Roy Leong (MAS) 11-4, 11-8, 11-2 (25m) (Match report to follow) Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) bt Yuta Fukui (JPN) 6-11, 11-8, 2-11, 11-3, 11-6 (57m) Opening round qualifying match between Aurangzeb and<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Photos by Paul Schwartz:</strong><br />
</em>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5251/' title='DSC_5251'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5251-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5251" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5253/' title='DSC_5253'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5253-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5253" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5256/' title='DSC_5256'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5256-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5256" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5262/' title='DSC_5262'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5262-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5262" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5276/' title='DSC_5276'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5276-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5276" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5281/' title='DSC_5281'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5281-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5281" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5284/' title='DSC_5284'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5284-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5284" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5285/' title='DSC_5285'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5285-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5285" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5289/' title='DSC_5289'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5289-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5289" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5291/' title='DSC_5291'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5291-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5291" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5297/' title='DSC_5297'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5297-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5297" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5302/' title='DSC_5302'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5302-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5302" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5308/' title='DSC_5308'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5308-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5308" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5312/' title='DSC_5312'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5312-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5312" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5315/' title='DSC_5315'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5315-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5315" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5326/' title='DSC_5326'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5326-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5326" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5333/' title='DSC_5333'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5333-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5333" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5336/' title='DSC_5336'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5336-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5336" /></a>
<a href='http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/dsc_5340/' title='DSC_5340'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DSC_5340-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DSC_5340" /></a>
</p>
<hr />
<strong>Matt Serediak (CAN) bt. Le Roy Leong (MAS) 11-4, 11-8, 11-2 (25m)<br />
</strong><br />
<em>(Match report to follow)<br />
</em><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-1-150x150.jpg" alt="photo 1" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) bt Yuta Fukui (JPN) 6-11, 11-8, 2-11, 11-3, 11-6 (57m)<br />
</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-2.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-2-150x150.jpg" alt="photo 2" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1367" /></a>Opening round qualifying match between Aurangzeb and Yuta started uneventfully with each player winning a game. After that, all hell broke loose. Yuta was stoic, paced, patient and calculating his shots, while Aurangzeb was fiery and hot tempered. This dramatic disparity in temperament resulted in an easy 11-3 win for Yuta, led by precise, attacking drop shots and incontestable deception. Aurangzeb changed his shirt  before game 4, to one with the name KHAN on the back. With this came a total personality change in the player. While still fiery, the hot-tempered anger was channeled into aggressive drop shots and ferocious retrieving speed, resulting in an equally lopsided 11-4 win for Aurangzeb. Game 5 brought even more energy out of Aurangzeb. He hit the ball with more pace than any previous game and ran faster in retrieval than in game one. The stoicism of Yuta turned to demoralization at the total transformation of his opponent and he lost game 5 to Aurangzeb. Service nicks, wild swings in momentum and both players diving for balls made this a memorable match.</p>
<p><strong>Mike McCue (CAN) bt Bryan Bonilla (GUA) 11-9, 11-5, 11-4 (30m)<br />
</strong><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-3.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-3-150x150.jpg" alt="photo 3" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1370" /></a>Qualifying match between Mike McCUe(CAN) and Bryan Bonilla (GUA) was much closer than the 3-0 score looks. A quick 5-1 start by McCue was eroded by 3 unforced tins to give Bonilla a 7-6 lead. Then Bonilla returned the tins and the lead back to McCue, losing the game on a stroke ball. Game 2 started with both players already soaked in sweat from the 11-9 first. Long opening rallys led to 2 more quick Bonilla tins followed by another after a 30 shot exchange. A 4th tin soon followed and McCue was up 7-1 on his way to 11-5 victory.Game 3 was notable for perfect width and frustratingly successful retrieving on McCue&#8217;s part ulitmately drawing more tins from Bonilla.</p>
<p><strong>Reuben Phillips (ENG) bt Paul Rawden (ENG) 11-9, 10-12, 11-8, 3-11, 11-5 (59m)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Syed Hamza Shah Bukhari (PAK) bt Baba Tunde Ajagbe (NGR) 11-7, 11-6, 11-8 (36m)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-4.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/photo-4-150x150.jpg" alt="photo 4" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1371" /></a><strong>Micah Franklin (BER) bt. Luke Butterworth (ENG) 13-11, 6-11, 11-8, 2-11, 11-9 (78m)</strong></p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>Chris Binnie (JAM) bt. Oscar Lopez (MEX) 11-7, 11-8, 11-4 (31m)<br />
</strong>Playing against the University of Rochester local Oscar Lopez from Mexico, Binnie looked very strong in the beginning but Lopez stayed in the rallies and pushed the Jamaican in the first two games. Unforced errors from Lopez gave the edge for Binnie though and he took the first two 11-7, 11-8.<br />
Lopez got a bad start to the third making several mistakes and giving Binnie a 4-0 lead. The Mexican then started to play better and moving his opponent more to the corners but Binnie&#8217;s lead was too big in the end. He won the third 11-4 and closed the match in three. Not a walk in the park for Binnie though.<br />
Oscar: &#8220;I played well and pushed hard. I just think he has more control and rhythm. Looking forward to playing more matches on this level &#8211; it&#8217;s a different experience.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Adam Perkiomaki (USA) bt. Tyler Hamilton (CAN) 11-8, 11-5, 11-6 (30m)<br />
</strong>A very quick start gave the attacking Perkiomaki a 4-0 lead in the first game. The Canadian found his rhythm eventually but never caught up &#8211; Perkiomaki took the first one 11-8. It was a similar start to the second one but Hamilton hung in and got up to 4-4. Perkiomaki hit some great winners after that and got himself a 9-5 lead in just a couple of minutes. Hamilton controlled the next rally from start to finish but Perkiomaki kept on retrieving everything. Perkiomaki eventually won what was the longest rally of the match and went on to win the second game 11-5.<br />
He continued a solid performance in the third and it seemed that Hamilton couldn&#8217;t find a way to win even though he came back fighting. Perkiomaki stayed focused and didn&#8217;t let the Canadian back into the game, winning 3-0.<br />
A solid performance by the Rochester senior who is now looking to challenge former Trinity player, Chris Binnie, in the final qualifying round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/09/quarterfinal-round-1-complete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get ready Rochester</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/07/get-ready-rochester-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/07/get-ready-rochester-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s almost here! For the 12th year in row, Rochester will bear witness to an annual squash spectacle this week. Thanks to all our sponsors, host families, supporters and visiting international squash professionals. Qualifying action starts at 6:00pm on Tuesday<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/07/get-ready-rochester-2/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost here!<br />
For the 12th year in row, Rochester will bear witness to an annual squash spectacle this week.<br />
Thanks to all our <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/sponsors/">sponsors</a>, <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/volunteers-housing/">host families</a>, supporters and <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/players/">visiting international squash professionals</a>.<br />
Qualifying action starts at 6:00pm on Tuesday 09 April 2013. (<a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/draws-and-schedule/">complete schedule</a>)</p>
<p>Tournament Brochure:<br />
<div id="attachment_1359" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 204px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2013TournamentBrochure-Combined.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2013TournamentBrochure-Combined-194x300.jpg" alt="2013 Tournament Brochure" width="194" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1359" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2013 Tournament Brochure</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2013/04/07/get-ready-rochester-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farag claims the 2012 Rochester ProAm title</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/29/farag-claims-the-2012-rochester-proam-title/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/29/farag-claims-the-2012-rochester-proam-title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the tournament director: Jesse&#8217;s match report below goes into the specifics but I&#8217;d like to make a special mention of the professionalism and sportsmanship that these two athletes displayed on and off the court during the match. Both Clinton<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/29/farag-claims-the-2012-rochester-proam-title/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From the tournament director:</strong><br />
Jesse&#8217;s match report below goes into the specifics but I&#8217;d like to make a special mention of the professionalism and sportsmanship that these two athletes displayed on and off the court during the match.<br />
Both Clinton Leeuw and Ali Farag played a clean, masterful game worthy of a final and delighted our sponsors and spectators. They showed us how this great sport should be played, applauding each other&#8217;s shots and entertaining the crowd. Thank you both for being such gentlemen and consummate professionals! </p>
<p><span id="more-1301"></span><em><strong>Match report by Jesse Cramer<br />
Photos to follow&#8230;.</strong><br />
</em><br />
<strong>Ali Farag (EGY) bt. Clinton Leeuw (RSA) 9-11, 11-8, 11-2, 11-8) (50m)<br />
</strong>Clinton Leeuw (RSA) came out firing today against Ali Farag (EGY), and Ali was slow to respond. A series of solid drops by Clinton and tins by Ali gave Clinton a 3-0 lead, which steadily grew to 5-1, then 8-2. Then, at 8-3, Clinton tripped over Ali at the T and stumbled awkwardly. Luckily, everyone was okay. But that marked a turning point as Ali started playing error-free and fought back to 6-8, then 8-9, then 9-9. We have ourselves a match! A tight drop from Clinton pinched Ali into a tin, and then a cross court fade bounced twice before Ali could get his racket on it. Clinton wins the first 11-9 in ten minutes. </p>
<p>The second game had Ali doing all the scoring early some. Some positive scoring via the nick, some negative scoring via the tin. The score was locked at 3, and the crowd was applauding or groaning after Ali’s every attack. Clinton kept playing steady squash and built a 5-3 lead. Ali fought back to 5-5 using a three wall boast nick and a stroke against Clinton. Clinton responded by dunking a loose crosscourt into the nick. Anything you can do, I can do better; Ali returns the serve into the nick and it’s 6-6. A few rare unforced errors by Clinton give Ali a 9-7, then a 10-8 lead. Another tin by Clinton, and Ali wins the second 11-8 in 10 minutes.</p>
<p>The third was all Ali from start to finish. Nick, nick, force a stroke. Hold, drop, drive, force a tin. Ali was up 9-0 before Clinton got on the board. Even in the rare rally that Clinton controlled, it was Ali who managed to score the point. After another winner and another tin, Ali had won the third 11-2 in 8 minutes.</p>
<p>In the fourth, Clinton came out determined not to let Ali attack any loose balls. Instead, he played tight drives and tight drops and built a 2-0 lead. But the easy tins continued to plague Clinton, and Ali fired back to take a 5-2 lead. The boys then went back and forth, exchanging nicks, tins, and strokes. Ali led 8-7, but Clinton had him on the run. Ali leaves a loose ball in the front; Clinton drops, but into the tin! The crowd groaned, a golden opportunity gone. But Clinton continued to fight and sent Ali the wrong way with a straight drive to pull back to 8-9. Clinton controlled the next rally as well, but Ali managed to play a three wall boast into the nick yet again; he had at least five rollers today from that same exact shot. Ali had secured two game balls. The crowd thoroughly enjoyed the next rally, as the boys had arguably saved their best squash for last. Great retrieving, great attacking. It was all out, as Clinton fought for the right the continue and Ali just wanted to end it. After 90 seconds of all out squash, Clinton just clipped the tin. Game and match to Ali, 11-8 after 14 minutes.</p>
<p>A great final after a fantastic tournament. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/29/farag-claims-the-2012-rochester-proam-title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semifinal roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/semifinal-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/semifinal-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match reports by Jesse Cramer Clinton Leeuw bt Wade Johnstone 11-8, 11-1, 11-8 (46m) Tonight’s first semifinal had South African Clinton Leeuw against Aussie Wade Johnstone. Clinton came out attacking, but straight into the tin. A few poor mistakes early<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/semifinal-roundup/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Match reports by Jesse Cramer</em><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Clinton Leeuw bt Wade Johnstone 11-8, 11-1, 11-8 (46m)<br />
</strong>Tonight’s first semifinal had South African Clinton Leeuw against Aussie Wade Johnstone. Clinton came out attacking, but straight into the tin. A few poor mistakes early on gave Wade a 5-2 lead. But, the game began to calm down. The first long rally of the match had Wade doing most of the work, and Clinton took advantage to bring the game back to 4-5. More solid play, and a fantastic drop by Clinton brought the score to 6-6. From there, Clinton strung together three solid rallies to give himself a commanding 9-6 lead. But, the tin monster reared its ugly head yet again; this time, two unforced mistakes by Clinton gave Wade new life. In the next rally, Wade hit a beautiful volley drop and then anticipated that Clinton would be forced to hit it cross court. Wade stepped up, expecting the volley. But somehow Clinton managed to delicately play a counter drop, and Wade was hung out to dry. That gave Clinton two game balls. On the first, Wade slipped as he played a forehand, and the shot went straight into the tin. Game 1 to Leeuw, 11-8 in 15 minutes.</p>
<p>The second game was locked at 1-1 when Clinton slipped and re-opened a knee wound from the previous rounds. After taking a few minutes to stop the bleeding, play resumed. Clionton returned to the court focused, while it seemed that Wade perhaps had lost his concentration. Clinton quickly built a 4-1 lead, then 6-1, then 8-1. Even when Wade had Clinton doing the occasional court sprint, he could not put the South African away. Clinton runs away with the second game 11-1 in 7 minutes (not including the injury time).</p>
<p>In the third, Wade came out re-focused and firing, quickly gaining a 2-0 lead. The game then went back and forth until the score reached 4-4. The next few points ended in a series of curious referee decisions (or, so the players would tell you); both Johnstone and Leeuw felt hard done by, and the score was 6-5 in favor of Clinton. Good length by Clinton, followed by a Wade tin, brought the score to 8-5. Wade storms back, 8-8. Wade then hits a loose boast; Clinton jumps onto it, holds, and flicks. Taxi! 9-8 to Clinton. In the next rally, Wade could scrape a tight drop off the wall. 10-8 to Leeuw. With two match balls, Clinton goes for the nick on the half-volley. The ball rolls out, game and match to Clinton 11-8 after 18 minutes.</p>
<p><iframe width="300" height="182" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/LE94LhjCqWQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Ali Farag (EGY) bt. Erik Tepos Valtierra (MEX) 14-12, 8-11, 12-10, 11-8 (65m)<br />
</strong>The second semifinal had crowd favorite Ali Farag (EGY) playing the steady Erik Tepos Valtierra (MEX). In the first, Ali came out firing. A quick 3-0 lead grew into 6-1. Tepos played consistently, hoping that Ali’s winners might turn into tins. And sure enough, they did. A series of lengthy rallies seemed to wane Ali’s focus, and he started shooting from poor positions on court. Tepos came back, bringing the score to 6-7. But then Ali found the nick again, followed by an ankle-breaking trickle boast. 9-6 to Farag. Then more tins; three in a row bring the score to 9-9. Another tin, and Tepos has game ball. Time to play safe? Hardly. Ali played a three wall boast off the serve directly into the nick. 10-10. Steady rallies bring the score to 11-11. Another nick, and Ali has a game ball. But Erik saves it, 12-12. The next two rallies gave Ali the game; but rather that attack, he won both points with tight, ungettable drives. First game to Farag, 14-12 in 14 minutes.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1296" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 167px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-21.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-21-157x300.jpg" alt="" title="Ali Farag" width="157" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1296" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ali Farag</p></div>In the second, Ali controlled play terrifically. Volleying, attacking. Tepos was running to and fro. But the tin continued to plague Ali’s final attack. Despite playing better squash for 90% of the rallies, Ali fell behind 6-3, then 8-5. Erik was picking everything up, and Ali was trying for too fine of a margin. The score grew to 10-5 for Tepos. Ali managed to fight off three game balls, but Erik converted the fourth. Game two to Erik, 11-8 after 12 minutes.</p>
<p>In the third, Erik continued to frustrate Ali with his retrieving. He jumped out to a 2-0 lead, which grew into 7-3 then 8-4. Ali stopped shooting altogether; he was hitting to many tins to ever win that way. Instead, he started playing tight rails, tight drops, no nick attempts at all. He fought back to 6-8, but another tin gave Erik a 9-6 lead. Two more long rallies, both going Ali’s way using tight rails. A trickle boast by Ali made it 9-9, and then a perfect hold-rail gave Ali a game ball at 10-9. Erik played a terrific next rally and fought back to 10-10. But Ali could not be denied. Ali won 11-10 using a perfect backhand drop, and then won the game using a delicate forehand drop. Farag wins the third 12-10 after 21 minutes.</p>
<p>Steady squash in the fourth brought the boys to 4-4. Perhaps the best point of the match ensued; the players took turns attacking and retrieving, and a ton of action took place in the front corners. The crowd applauded loudly afterwards despite the point ending in a let! The game went on, and a pair on tins gave Erik a 6-4 lead. Ali went back to playing straight and tight, and tied the game at 6-6. More steady play from Ali, and he took a 9-8 lead. Then, Tepos tinned on a straight drop; it was one of his only unforced errors all day, and it occurred at such an inopportune time. That gave Ali a 10-8 lead and two game balls. On the next rally, Ali played a run-of-the-mill backhand drop. Tepos went in and lobbed it to the back right corner. Ali leaped into the air to volley, and planted his shot directly into the crosscourt nick. The crowd gasped at the athleticism and gutsy shotmaking, and then gave both players a standing ovation as they left the court. Well played boys.</p>
<p>Tomorrow’s final between Clinton and Ali will take place at noon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/semifinal-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quarterfinals complete</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/quarterfinals-complete-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/quarterfinals-complete-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match reports by Jesse Cramer Clinton Leeuw (RSA) bt. Hernan D&#8217;Arcangelo (ARG) 11-4, 11-9, 11-2 (26m) Clinton Leeuw (RSA) took the game to Hernan D’Arcangelo (ARG) starting from the first point. Clinton’s movement was quick and efficient, and his holds<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/quarterfinals-complete-2/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Match reports by Jesse Cramer</em><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Clinton Leeuw (RSA) bt. Hernan D&#8217;Arcangelo (ARG) 11-4, 11-9, 11-2 (26m)<br />
</strong>Clinton Leeuw (RSA) took the game to Hernan D’Arcangelo (ARG) starting from the first point. Clinton’s movement was quick and efficient, and his holds from the front kept Hernan unsure and unbalanced. Hernan simply could not apply enough pressure to make Clinton doubt himself, and the game lasted only 8 miuntes. 11-4 to Leeuw. </p>
<p><div id="attachment_1285" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/leeuw.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/leeuw-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Leeuw vs D&#039;Arcangelo" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1285" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Leeuw vs D&#039;Arcangelo</p></div>Similar play continued into the second, but some sloppy finishing by Clinton kept Hernan within reach. The boys were locked at 5 after two consecutive drop shot tins by Leeuw. Then he strung together some beautiful points to take a 9-5 lead. But the tin plague struck him again; this time, three tins in a row pulled Hernan back to 8-9. A tight rail by Hernan then tied things at 9. Luckily for Clinton, the tin was unlucky for both players. This time, Hernan made erros on two consecutive points to give Clinton the game 11-9 after 10 minutes. </p>
<p>Leeuw came out determined to play cleaner squash in the third. Perfect play gave him a 4-0, then 5-1 lead. He was volleying everything he could, fighting to stay on the T. The lead grew to 9-1 as Hernan could not quite keep up with the pace. A pretty straight nick gave Clinton 10-1 and nine match balls. Clinton won the second, giving him the third 11-2 after 8 minutes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/crowd.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/crowd-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Quarterfinal crowd" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1286" /></a><strong>Wade Johnstone (AUS) bt. Matthew Serediak (CAN) 11-9, 12-10, 11-6 (42m)<br />
</strong>The other 6:00 PM match featured Wade Johnstone (AUS) and Matt Serediak (CAN). The play started even and steady, nothing that would set the world alight. Back and forth, the game reached 6-6. But then Wade went on a little run, taking advantage of a couple tins by Matt. 11-9 to Wade.</p>
<p>Matt came out re-focused in the second. He maintained a small lead throughout, as 5-3 grew to 8-5. Then a pair of untimely tins and a few nice winners from Wade brought the score to 9-9, then 10-10. After a couple long, searching rallies, Wade had the game won at 12-10.</p>
<p>Matt seemed to tire a bit in the third, and Wade took full advantage. Tight, deep squash gave Wade a 4-2 lead that grew to 7-4. Even when Matt did apply pressure, Wade retrieved brilliantly, mitigating even Matt’s best shots. A perfect lob gave Wade four match balls at 10-6. He capitalized on the first, winning the third game 11-6.</p>
<p><strong>Ali Farag (EGY) bt. Scott Arnold 11-9, 9-11, 12-10, 10-12, 11-5 (81m)<br />
</strong>The best match of the night saw young, mercurial Ali Farag (EGY) against lengthy, smooth Scott Arnold (AUS). The game was even early on, tied at 4. Then some terrific shots from the front court gave Ali a 7-4 advantage. Scott retrieved brilliantly, but Ali was too good. The lead grew to 10-6. Scott fought off three game balls using steady length, rebuffing any of Ali’s attacks. But a thunderous tin at 10-9 gave Ali the first game, 11-9.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1287" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/farag.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/farag-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Farag vs Arnold" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1287" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Farag vs Arnold</p></div>The second found both players fighting for T position. The game was locked at 3, then 5, then 7. A feathery drop gave Ali an 8-7 lead, but a taxiing flick by Scott brought the game back to 8-8. A tight rail by Scott followed by a poor nick attempt from Ali gave Scott a 10-8 lead. Ali fought off the first, but tinned on the second. Game to Scott, 11-9.</p>
<p>Ali started out loose in the third, and Scott took full advantage. His lead was quickly 6-2. Then Ali calmed himself and came roaring back. Great shotmaking brought the score back to 5-6. A lob out of court by Scott tied things at 6. After a few more rallies, it was 8-8. A straight nick by Scott, followed by a lucky guess when Ali held him in the front, and Scott had two game balls. But Ali fought both off, and then won the next point to give him 11-10. After a short rally, Ali lept onto a loose forehand rail and dunked the ball into the nick. Game to Ali 12-10. </p>
<p>The fourth was fierce. Scott jumped out to 4-1, then Ali fought back to 4-4. Back and forth to 6-6. A loose boast gave Scott time to deceive Ali in the front right corner; too much time it turned out, as Scott’s hold-drop clipped the tin. After a “no let” and a pair of strokes, the score was locked at 8. A perfect length by Scott gave him 9-8, but he immediately followed it with a tin. 9-9. Ali forced Scott to leave a ball out in the middle, but this time it was Ali who clipped the tin. 10-9 to Scott. Ali fought off the game ball, but could not permanently deny Scott. A tight drop followed by a lob out of court gave the tall Aussie the fourth, 12-10.</p>
<p>The fifth started out very even. 2-2, 3-3, then 4-4. There were some terrific rallies ending in lets; the crowd especially loved watching Ali dart in and out of the deep corners, refusing to go down easily. Scott simply could not put Ali away. Eventually, Scott began to aim lower and lower on the front wall, trying to put the ball out of Ali’s reach. But, he ventured too low. A series of tins moved the game from 5-5 to 9-5 in Ali’s favor. Yet another tin brought the score to 10-5. Ali secured the match on his first match ball, winning the fifth 11-5.</p>
<p><strong>Erik Tepos Valtierra (MEX) bt. Josh Cardwell (AUS) 11-9, 8-11, 11-4, 11-1 (50m)<br />
</strong><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/erik.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/erik-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Tepos vs Cardwell" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1288" /></a><br />
Cardwell started off the first game with and 8-3 lead. Erik was just getting warmed up and dug back in but it was to large a ap to bridge wth Cardwell taking the first game 11-9.<br />
In the second Erik shot back with a 6-0 lead finishing off at 11-8. Game score 1-1.<br />
The third and fourth were comfortable 11-4, 11-1 wins for Erik winning him a place in the semifinals. </p>
<div id="attachment_1290" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/players.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/players-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="The Players" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1290" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The pros relaxing over a meal at the &quot;Party with the Pros&quot;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/28/quarterfinals-complete-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Main Draw &#8211; First Round of Matches</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/26/main-draw-first-round-of-matches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/26/main-draw-first-round-of-matches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match reports by Jesse Cramer Hernan D&#8217;Arcangelo (ARG) bt. Thomas Brinkman (CAN) 11-5, 11-8, 11- 7 (47m) Hernan D’Arcangelo (ARG) came out playing tight, steady squash against Thomas Brinkman (CAN). It was clear from the beginning that Hernan’s mission was<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/26/main-draw-first-round-of-matches/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-11.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-11-e1335502063970-225x300.jpg" alt="" title="ProAm 2012 Poster" width="225" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1278" /></a></p>
<p><em><strong>Match reports by Jesse Cramer<br />
</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>Hernan D&#8217;Arcangelo (ARG) bt. Thomas Brinkman (CAN) 11-5, 11-8, 11- 7 (47m)</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-31.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-31-e1335501873254-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Hernan D&#039;Arcangelo" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1275" /></a>Hernan D’Arcangelo (ARG) came out playing tight, steady squash against Thomas Brinkman (CAN). It was clear from the beginning that Hernan’s mission was to keep the ball above the tin. Thomas was willing to play steady squash for a while, but usually it was he who attacked first. Unfortunately, Hernan picked everything up off the front wall, and kept Thomas at the back of the court. The boys were locked at 5-5, but Thomas was worse for wear. Hernan took advantage and strung together 6 straight points. After 16 minutes of straight drives and occasional boasts, Hernan had the first won at 11-5. </p>
<p>The second started out the same as the first. Steady play, but Hernan usually getting the better of Thomas. This time, the score got to 8-8 before the lactic acid began to show in Thomas’s movement. After a couple deep lunges in the back corners, Thomas couldn’t retrieve Hernan’s volley drop. That gave Hernan a 9-8 edge, and two tins from Thomas gave him the game at 11-8 after 15 minutes. </p>
<p>In the third game, Thomas managed to find his game, except for the final shot. The first two rallies found Hernan doing court sprints while Thomas staying cozily on the T. Yet, when Thomas decided to attack short, he clipped the tin twice. Frustrated, his play began to slow and Hernan took full advantage. The game was 6-2 to Hernan in no time. Thomas managed to string a few point together, but Hernan was just too strong, too steady. The third game goes to Hernan 11-7 after 12 minutes.</p>
<p><strong>Clinton Leeuw (RSA) bt. Yasir Butt (PAK) 11-7, 11-7, 8-11, 11-6 (53m)</strong><br />
Top seed Yasir Butt (PAK) stepped on court with Clinton Leeuw (RSA) and immediately asserted himself; quickly, Clinton was in a 3-0, then 6-3 hole. But then Clinton found his length. To everyone’s surprise, Clinton reeled off seven straight points&#8211;tight, fast, on the volley&#8211;to take a 10-6 lead. Yasir fought off one game ball, but Clinton could not be denied. Game to the underdog Leeuw, 11-7.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1277" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-4.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-4-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Clinton Leeuw &amp; Rory Pennell" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-1277" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Clinton Leeuw &#038; Rory Pennell</p></div>Both players stepped on court in the second ready to play. The crowd was delighted by the fast pace and great retrieving. The fellas were tied at 4, then some back and forth play brought the score to 8-7 in Clinton’s favor. A long, probing rally ensued; neither player was willing to go short. Then, out of nowhere, Clinton slammed a slightly loose rail into the nick, bringing loud applause from the packed audience. Two more short rallies both ended in Clinton’s favor and he took the second 11-7.</p>
<p>Yasir came out in the third determined to prove why he was the number one seed. He controlled the court deftly, playing from the T while Clinton ran around him. After a 4-4 start, Yasir took five of the next six points to take a controlling 9-5 lead. Clinton played the next few rallies fiercely, determined to come back and get off in three. But Yasir was too strong, taking the third 11-8.</p>
<p>Yasir had finally settled in, and the crowd sensed that perhaps Clinton was losing his grasp. After the initial rallies, it was Yasir who looked the stronger despite being down 3-4. But, just like in the first game, Clinton managed to find a new gear. He began to play inspired squash, keeping Yasir deep in the court then attacking with perfect straight drops. Yasir simply could not keep up. After five straight points to Clinton (9-3), the match was all but over. Yasir scraped a few points back, but Clinton finished in style by thundering a match ball into the nick, deader than Elvis<br />
<iframe width="300" height="182" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gvLOM9h-GTo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Wade Johnstone (AUS) bt. Andres Duany (PER) 11-6, 11-7, 11-8 (35m)</strong><br />
Both fellas felt like the straight nick was the right place to start, as five of the first six points rolled out from little angle. A series of steady rallies brought the score to 6-4 in favor of Wade as he began to move Andres around the court. A pair of Duany tins gave Wade an 8-4 advantage. Andres managed to pull a bit tighter at 9-6, but a Wade winner and Duany tin ended the first. 11-6 to Wade after 11 minutes. </p>
<p>The second game started out with Wade moving Duany to all four corners. He was volleying everything he could, playing stereotypical “Australian” squash. But Duany stayed in it and began to read Wade’s play. After falling behind 2-0. Duany made a run to take a 4-2 lead. But Wade stayed steady, and began to force errors off of Andres’ racket. After a few long rallies, Wade tied things at 5, then pulled away to an 8-5 advantage, and then 10-7. Wade capitalized on his first game ball after a beautiful final rally. 11-7 to Wade after 11 minutes. </p>
<p>The qualifying began to show in Duany’s legs during the third game. Tired movements led to poor shots and even more pressure. Wade, meanwhile, still looked fresh. Although Duany won the first two points, Wade kept up the pressure and built a 10-4 lead. With six game balls, the victory seemed inevitable for the veteran Johnstone. But then Duany found his game! A couple of tins by Wade, followed by two rolling nicks brought the game back to 8-10, and the crowd began to liven. But Wade stayed steady. After a long, patient rally, he squeezed Andres into a lob out of court. Game to Wade 11-8 in 10 minutes. </p>
<p><strong>Matt Serediak (CAN) bt. Beni Fischer (SUI) 12-10, 10-12, 11-4, 11-8 (49m)</strong><br />
Matt Serediak (CAN) and Beni Fischer (SUI) were, according to the other professionals in attendance, equal players. Both quick, solid, nothing too fancy. They’ll both wear you down. Yet, despite the close games and even play, it was Serediak’s day. </p>
<p>The first game was back and forth throughout. Neither player had more than a two point advantage. Not surprisingly, the boys found themselves at 10-10. But Serediak’s experience showed itself, and he played exquisite squash for the next two rallies to win the first game 12-10. </p>
<p>The second game started as a continuation of the first. Matt jumped out to a 6-1 lead playing error-free squash. But Beni fought back hard, playing faster and tighter than Matt. His attacks had bite, and he was ready to pounce on the volley. Point after point went Beni’s way, bringing the score back to 7-7, and then 10-8. But Matt was not ready to let Beni tie the match; he fought off both game balls, forcing another 10-10. But this game, it was Beni’s turn to win consecutive points and take the game 12-10. </p>
<p>The third was a different game entirely. Matt began to attack vigorously, while Beni was slow to react to the change of styles. A 3-0 lead for Matt quickly bloomed to 8-3. He was controlling play, hitting winners or forcing tins. Beni had no answer and quickly fell 4-11. </p>
<p>The fourth began just like the third. Matt was attacking, Beni was retrieving, and the score was quickly 6-1 to Serediak. But this game, Beni charged back, tying the game at 8-8. But all the work in his legs began to take its toll. Three straight tins from Beni ended the game and the match. 11-8 to Serediak.<br />
<iframe width="300" height="182" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KhQjv1zei_U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Ali Farag (EGY) bt. Joe Chapman (BVI) 7-11, 11-7, 11-3, 11-7 (45m) </strong><br />
In the first 8:00 PM match to get underway, a couple of College Squash Association (CSA) rivals met in the form of Harvard&#8217;s Ali Farag (EGY) and Rochester’s Joe Chapman (BVI). Despite his underdog position, Joe came out the more positive player. His play was simply too tight for Ali to attack. A 4-2 lead grew into 9-5 after Joe kept squeezing Ali to the wall. After a few more passive rallies, Joe had it won 11-7.</p>
<p>But in the second, Ali began to assert himself; the Egyptian has arrived. Nicks, flicks, amazing anticipation. The pace picked up, but Joe could not. Ali controlled from start to finish. The rare rally that found Joe on the T, Ali gazelled about the court to pick up every shot. The second goes to Ali quite easily, 11-7. </p>
<p>The third mirrored the second. Ali moving Joe about while maintaining T position. Joe was running, but Ali was winning. Ali’s drops were barely retrievable, and the ensuing rails were just within reach. Ali’s 3-0 advantage grew to 8-2, and the running began to show in Joe’s movement. A few more cross court flicks, and Ali’s had it won 11-3. </p>
<p>Ali kept his momentum from the third and maintained a lead throughout the fourth. A pair of three wall boasts into the nick drew some ooooh’s from the audience, but Joe fought valiantly. Despite Ali’s shotmaking, Joe had the game tied at 5-5. But the ensuing rally found Joe doing court sprints, and the momentum was solidly back in Ali’s favor. Four consecutive points brought the game to 9-5, and a cross court drop into the nick (even Martin Heath was shaking his head) gave Ali four game balls at 10-6. Ali capitalized on the first was a trickle boast, winning 11-6</p>
<p><strong>Scott Arnold (AUS) bt. Adrian Dudzicki (CAN) 9-11, 11-7, 11-5, 11-3 (55m) </strong></p>
<p><strong>Josh Cardwell (AUS) bt. Chris Binnie (JAM) 11-8, 7-11, 11-8, 11-7 (59m)</strong><br />
Jamaican qualifier Chris Binnie takes on the tournament’s other Aussie, Josh Cardwell, in the final round of matches. Although Josh came out quicker, Chris managed to pick up a few points and a 4-3 lead early on. A few flick winners and a nice reverse boast, and Chris built his lead to 8-5. But a pair of weak tins and some solid play by Josh, and the game was back at 8-8, and then 9-8 to Josh. Another tin gave Josh two game balls, and Josh won the first. Game to Cardwell 11-8 in 15 minutes. </p>
<p>The second game started out with Cardwell in control again, but Binnie stuck in it. The Aussie took a 2-0 lead after some long rallies filled with deep lunges by Binnie. But eventually his hard work paid off. A few nice winners and a tin by Josh gave Chris a 7-5 lead. A pretty nick and perfect length then extended Chris’s lead to 10-5. After a couple weak winner attempts by Chris, and finally came through via the unorthadox dying corkscrew. Binnie wins the second 11-7 in 12 minutes. </p>
<p>The third was vital, and both players fought tooth and nail throughout. But it seemed that Josh had more energy to push. Perhaps Binnie’s tough match against Zeb Mehmund the night before left him slightly fatigued. Early on, the boys were locked at 4-4, and then 7-7. A couple of long rallies favored Josh, and he snuck ahead 9-7. A volley drop that just clipped the tin gave Josh three game balls. Binnie fought off the first, but couldn’t scrape off a tight rail on the second. Game to Cardwell 11-8 in 12 minutes.</p>
<p>The fourth game saw Binnie attacking and Cardwell on the defensive. Unfortunately, Cardwell moved too well and a few too many of Binnie’s drops found the tin. The game stayed close at 8-7, but Josh won three consecutive points to win the game and the match. Fourth game to Cardwell 11-7.</p>
<p><strong>Erik Tepos Valtierra (MEX) bt. Graham Bassett (USA) 11-5, 11-8, 11-8 (43m) </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/26/main-draw-first-round-of-matches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualifying final round &#8211; Three locals proceed to the Main Draw</title>
		<link>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/25/qualifying-final-round/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/25/qualifying-final-round/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mithun Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocprosquash.com/?p=1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match report by Jesse Cramer THREE LOCALS PROCEED TO THE MAIN DRAW A beautiful showing for former and current College Squash players tonight in the final round of Qualifying at the Rochester Pro-Am. University of Rochester’s Joe Chapman and Andres<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span> <a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/25/qualifying-final-round/"><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more --></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Match report by Jesse Cramer</em><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>THREE LOCALS PROCEED TO THE MAIN DRAW<br />
</strong>A beautiful showing for former and current College Squash players tonight in the final round of Qualifying at the Rochester Pro-Am. University of Rochester’s Joe Chapman and Andres Duany advanced, as did former Trinity star Chris Binnie and American player Graham Bassett. An opportune time for the launch of <a href="http://www.squashuroc.com">SquashURoc.com, the unofficial University of Rochester Squash Blog.</a></p>
<div id="attachment_1265" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo.jpg"><img src="http://www.rocprosquash.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo.jpg" alt="" title="Duany and Chapman" width="500" height="500" class="size-full wp-image-1265" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">University of Rochester locals Andres Duany (PER) and Joe Chapman (BVI) are all smiles as they proceed to the main draw tomorrow</p></div>
<p><strong>Andres Duany (PER) bt. Gerardo De Paul Garcia (MEX) 11-6, 11-5, 11-4 (38m)<br />
<em>plays Wade Johnstone (AUS)<br />
</em></strong>A series of long, patient rallies starting tonight’s match between Andres Duany (PER) and Gerardo de Paul Garcia (MEX). Unfortunately for Duany, too many of those rallies ended in tins or de Paul winner. All too soon, the Peruvian was down 6-3. But a questionable “no let” in Duany’s favor turned the tides. Either de Paul was rattled, or Duany calmed his nerves; maybe it was both. Either way, Duany strung eight straight points together using tight drops and quick flicks to win the first 11-6 in 11 minutes. </p>
<p>Andres used the momentum from the first to carry him through the second. A quick 4-2 lead grew into 8-4 through a succession of solid rallies from Duany and volley-drop errors from Gerardo. A beautiful straight kill followed by a perfect lob gave Duany five game balls. He capitalized on his first with a slightly lucky back wall nick, giving him the second game 11-5 in 10 minutes.</p>
<p>Again in the third, Andres leaped out to a 3-0, then a 5-1 lead. He was playing pressure squash, using all four corners to run Gerardo around and keep him on the defensive. With too much time in the front of the court, even the crowd was reacting unsurely to Duany’s holds and flicks as the lead grew to 9-2. The match was all but over, and after a few more non-descript rallies, Andres had it won 11-4 in 11 minutes. </p>
<p><iframe width="300" height="182" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1JAmMgUeKnQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Joe Chapman (BVI) bt. Patrick Chifunda (ZAM) 11-4, 6-11, 11-8, 11-3 (50m)<br />
<strong><em>plays Ali Farag (EGY)</em><br />
</strong></strong>Early on, Patrick Chifunda (ZAM) had Joe Chapman (BVI) on a leash, leading young Chapman around the court from corner to corner. Yet, Joe managed to stay in the rallies long enough to hit a couple lucky winners and force some Chifunda tins. Despite being the lone player breathing heavily, Joe found himself leading 4-0. After taking a deep breath, Joe calmed his nerves and rode that lead to a 11-4 victory in the first in 10 minutes. </p>
<p>But Patrick came out determined in the second, playing fast, tight, and looking for the volley. In this game, Patrick was finishing off his positive rallies. A quick 3-0 lead steadily grew to 7-4 with a series of vicious drives from the front of the court. Patrick blew Joe back on his heels, always waiting until the last minute to hit straight, cross, or boast. Throw in Patrick’s favorite reverse boast from the front of the court, and he quickly won the second 11-6 in 9 miuntes. </p>
<p>The third was much more even. Both players put in a lot of effort, neither exactly controlling the pace. But Joe won the first few points quickly, gaining 3-0 lead in 45 seconds. Using steady, tight length, Joe extended the lead out to 8-4, and then 10-6. But Joe seemed a bit shaky despite owning four games balls. A pair of poor (no offense, Joe) tins took the score to 10-8. Crunch time. The longest rally of the match ensued, with neither player willing to go short. Finally, Joe played a tight volley drop that Patrick barely retrieved. But his lob to the back hit just out of court, giving the point and game to Joe “Fist Pump” Chapman. 11-8 to Joe in 15 minutes. </p>
<p>And Joe didn’t feel like losing his momentum. He quickly gained a 6-1 lead in the fourth; no errors and steady retrieving. After a few tough rallies also going Joe’s way, he had too much confidence to lose. The fourth goes to Joe 11-3 in 9 minutes.<br />
<iframe width="300" height="182" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/J5uHRqHjZxg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Chris Binnie (JAM) bt. Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) 11-6, 9-11, 14-12, 11-9 (79m)<br />
<em>plays Josh Cardwell (AUS)<br />
</em></strong>From the first rally, there was a clear difference in styles. Chris Binnie (JAM) used his size and strength control the T and keep Aurangzeb Mehmund (PAK) behind him. Mehmund used his quickness and smooth racket to stay in the rallies and keep his bigger opponent from ending the rallies too quickly. But, he who controls the T controls the rally, and Chris was doing an excellent job. Without too much trouble, Binnie wins the first 11-6 in 10 minutes. </p>
<p>In the second, both players were more willing to attack; the rallies were rife with front court action. Binnie used some nice drops and counter-drops to quickly get a 5-2 lead. But Zeb fought back to 5 all using a couple of “What just happened?” cross court nicks. The boys then found themselves locked at 7 before a couple of poor shot selections by Zeb gave Chris the opportunity to take a 9-7 lead. But Zeb regained his focus and brought this pivotal game back to 9-9, and played used a vicious cross court fade to get a game ball at 10-9. A Binnie tin gave Zeb the second 11-9 in 12 minutes. </p>
<p>Both players knew winning the third game was vital to victory. Every decision by the referee was questioned, or at least drew a suspicious glare. And the squash was heated as well. Binnie held on to a one or two point lead all the way to 8-6. After a series of long rallies and lets, Zeb hit a forehand reverse boast from the left side of the court (should I include a diagram?) that fooled everyone, Chris included. Frustrations grew as the pace quickened. Zeb hit a perfect dying length to bring the game to 8 all. A “no let” gave Binnie 9-8, and a straight forehand kill (along with a fist pump and yawpish “Let’s go!”) gave him two game balls. Zeb saved the first with a thunderous nick, and an out of court lob by Binnie brought the game to 10 all. A winner by each then yielded 11 all. A volley reverse boast gave Zeb his first game ball at 12-11. Let, let, let, then Binnie pulls it back to 12-12. “No let” after a perfect dying length gives Binnie another game ball at 13-12 and this time he capitalized. After a long rally, Chris found the nick after Zeb’s rail popped out to the middle. 14-12 to Binnie after 31 minutes. Take a breather fellas.</p>
<p>Back-to-back flicks drops and a tin by Chris, and Zeb jumps out to a 3-0 lead that quickly grew to 5-1, then 7-2 in the fourth. Zeb’s play was much tighter than in the second, and Chris had little choice but to scrape shots off the wall into the middle of the court. A few back and forth points brought the game to 8-5. A nick and an error brought Chris right back into it at 7-8, but a thunderous straight nick from zero angle gave Zeb the key two point advantage yet again. But it didn’t last, as consecutive unretrievable backhand drops brought the game to 9 all. After a series of lets, the referee warned both players to “play the ball, not the player.” A tin by Zeb gave Binnie his first match ball at 10-9. Then, after a lengthy rally, Chris’s rail popped out into the middle, and Zeb did not play it; instead, he opted to find Chris with his racket and ask for a let (or stroke?). To everyone’s surprise (but to the ref’s credit), the referee stuck to his previous warning, and issued a “no let” on match ball. Game and match to Binnie 11-9. </p>
<p><strong>Graham Bassett bt. Arshad Iqbal Burki 7-11, rtd. (14m)<br />
<em>plays Erik Tepos Valtierra (MEX)<br />
</em></strong>The other 7:00 PM match featured American Graham Bassett and Pakistani Arshad Iqbal Burki. Arshad got off to a quick, efficient start; before the match was five minutes old, he held an 8-4 lead. But Graham fought back to 7-8, and Arshad began to wince a bit between points, flexing his leg. Nevertheless, Arshad hit a couple gorgeous nicks and took the game 11-7 in 14 minutes. But the leg was a major issue; Arshad had re-aggravated a pre-existing hamstring niggle, and could not continue. </p>
<p>Bassett over Iqbal Burki (7-11, RET) in 14 minutes </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rocprosquash.com/2012/04/25/qualifying-final-round/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
